Quote:
Originally Posted by Barcey
It doesn't strike me as a scientific study. Fifty people isn't a very large sample and I don't understand the rational of breaking them into two groups of 25. Why not have two stories and two series of tests and then have all participants read and test on paper and then all read and test on eink? I would expect that to be a more logical methodology and reproducible for scientific validation.
|
Because then you wouldn't know if the difference was related to differences in the texts, and you obviously couldn't use the same text twice.