Thread: Report: Readers absorb less on Kindles than on Paper
View Single Post
Old 08-21-2014, 01:00 PM   #11
crich70
Grand Sorcerer
crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.crich70 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
crich70's Avatar
 
Posts: 11,310
Karma: 43993832
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Monroe Wisconsin
Device: K3, Kindle Paperwhite, Calibre, and Mobipocket for Pc (netbook)
I don't know about absorbing more or less details depending on the medium the book is presented in but I think I'm more likely to always have a book to hand using my Kindle than in any other medium available. I mean which is more portable? A 500 page book that weighs up to a lb and is up to 2" thick or a 500 page ebook that is less than .25" thick and weighs in at 8 ounces? I'll choose the ebook reader any time.
crich70 is offline   Reply With Quote