View Single Post
Old 08-20-2014, 07:50 PM   #11
SteveEisenberg
Grand Sorcerer
SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,463
Karma: 44114178
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: near Philadelphia USA
Device: Kindle Kids Edition, Fire HD 10 (11th generation)
I count 22 different lists, as can be seen in the left panel here:

http://www.nytimes.com/best-sellers-...ence/list.html

The above science bestseller list has twenty titles, but most of them have twenty-five. This makes for a lot of New York Times bestselling authors.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Katsunami View Post
It could even be the case that I *DON'T* have any books *WITHOUT* this recommendation, apart from non-English books and classics.
Yes, for the reason noted above. But if marked as follows, it's almost a dis-recommendation:

Quote:
A dagger (†) indicates that some bookstores report receiving bulk orders.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jersysman View Post
I am more into Indie authors for the last few years.
They do list a few titles where the name of the author and publisher are the same.

I think the reason they don't list more self-published eBooks is lack of input from Amazon.

Somewhat strangely, the Bezos-owned Washington Post's bestseller lists don't include eBooks:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinio...6a3_story.html
SteveEisenberg is offline   Reply With Quote