View Single Post
Old 08-14-2014, 05:49 PM   #361
Rev. Bob
Wizard
Rev. Bob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rev. Bob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rev. Bob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rev. Bob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rev. Bob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rev. Bob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rev. Bob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rev. Bob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rev. Bob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rev. Bob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Rev. Bob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Rev. Bob's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,760
Karma: 9918418
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Here on the perimeter, there are no stars
Device: Kobo H2O, iPad mini 3, Kindle Touch
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSWolf View Post
I think it is worth it. It just looks better when the end of the page is more consistent and that looks better.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anak View Post
Sure, it is just my opinion and I was trying to find some common ground as there is no perfect solution.
Everyone's entitled to their own opinion. Me, I'm in it to read books as a consumer and to publish books as a formatter, so I'm on two of the three sides here. (Consumer, producer, renderer.)

When I'm reading, a blank line or two doesn't bother me. When I'm formatting, I want to write standards-compliant code and not have to worry about what Platform X or Device Y will do with it. That's why you'll always see me push for better standards compliance, both from producers and renderers; the more both of those sides demand compliant behavior from each other, the better an experience the consumers get and the less bloated the code can get.

I wouldn't object to a checkbox to switch between behaviors - "fill screen" vs. "follow defined w&o behavior" - but I would strongly object to just breaking standards.
Rev. Bob is offline   Reply With Quote