Quote:
Originally Posted by eschwartz
I have already answered you above, but in case you didn't notice, I will reiterate:
I am confident in my sources, which say you are wrong. You are trying to prove to me otherwise, and thus, the burden of proof is on you. Your sources are not available to me, so now you try telling me:
that I am required (!!!) to pay money in order to make your arguments more effective! 
Does anyone else here get the feeling that we are in Wonderland? |
What do you mean I was trying to prove you otherwise? I was responding to a totally different poster. The fact that I quoted Harry T's post in my reply was probably a real big clue to anyone who was actually paying attention.
So your anonymous sources trumps my linking to the WSJ. Hum, I think I'll stick with the WSJ on this one. They have a pretty good track record for financial matters. Yea, I feel like I'm in Wonderland, but I suspect we disagree on who the Mad Hatter is in this thread.