View Single Post
Old 08-12-2014, 01:55 PM   #60
BearMountainBooks
Maria Schneider
BearMountainBooks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BearMountainBooks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BearMountainBooks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BearMountainBooks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BearMountainBooks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BearMountainBooks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BearMountainBooks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BearMountainBooks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BearMountainBooks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BearMountainBooks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BearMountainBooks ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
BearMountainBooks's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,746
Karma: 26439330
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Near Austin, Texas
Device: 3g Kindle Keyboard
Quote:
Originally Posted by eschwartz View Post
See above, under good/bad publicity.

(I think if it was an indie, that would be good publicity. Considering how big Penguin and Roald Dahl are... they will lose more than they gain. )
I agree. I think people who have read the book or seen the movie are a little insulted by the cover (this impression comes from forum threads). But even under the "any publicity" rule...the cover is a turn-off. If I didn't know what the book was about, I'd never pick this book up. Even KNOWING what the book is about I would look for an old copy if I needed one rather than buy that book.

One of the good things about ebooks is that you can read books and not have the cover displayed. (I hate the Patricia Briggs covers in general. Was always glad I didn't have to see some of those covers every time I picked up the book). If I owned this book, it is one where I would likely rip the cover off. It's is creepy and ugly.
BearMountainBooks is offline   Reply With Quote