View Single Post
Old 08-04-2014, 10:22 AM   #232
ApK
Award-Winning Participant
ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,393
Karma: 68715774
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NJ, USA
Device: Kindle
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barcey View Post
Just curious, where did you think you saw the word 'cap' in Amazon's statement or Felix's posts?
It's implied by the fact they state only small number of specialized titles should be allowed to go higher.

The difference between seeing that as a "cap" vs a "baseline" is the specific implementation of the the terms "small number" and "specialized."

I have to admit that the way Amazon phrases it in the OP smacks more of "cap," but I really believe it's more of a negotiating tactic than what Amazon really expects to do, so that they can later be seen to make compromises in favor of the publisher and show what fair and easy-to-work-with partners they are.
I expect it will end up being more of a baseline.

Last edited by ApK; 08-04-2014 at 10:24 AM.
ApK is offline   Reply With Quote