Quote:
Originally Posted by speakingtohe
Many descendants AFAIK don't bother with royalties hence the orphaned works. I agree orphaned works should be addressed and dealt with, but don't see it as a reason to drastically alter copyright on published works.
Helen
|
I agree that copyright should not have been drastically altered. It should have remained what it was origionally, 14 years plus, at most, 14 more if requested.