View Single Post
Old 07-31-2014, 07:57 AM   #142
ApK
Award-Winning Participant
ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,393
Karma: 68715774
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NJ, USA
Device: Kindle
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
Unfortunately, reducing the numbers still won't make Android a real-time operating system (RTOS). That's inherent in the OS architecture: iOS is an RTOS, and Android isn't. That's not a criticism - simply a fact. It's not the latency as such that's an issue with non-real-time o/s's, but the fact that the latency is unpredictable, and changing the absolute number won't alter that. For the specific uses of musicians, iOS will always be a better platform than Android.

Windows CE is also an RTOS, as a matter of interest.
I'd not have thought musicians need an RTOS for these purposes. OS or audio experts please correct me if I'm mistaken, but pros have been happily using non-RT systems like Windows and Mac OS for a long time.
I can see that an RTOS would be a great facility to take advantage of, but low latency, and adequate speed are all that's needed. The audio domain is lot more tolerant than, say, RADAR.
BTW, I didn't know iOS was a real-time OS. Interesting.
ApK is offline   Reply With Quote