View Single Post
Old 07-28-2014, 03:21 PM   #318
JSWolf
Resident Curmudgeon
JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
JSWolf's Avatar
 
Posts: 80,096
Karma: 148565303
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Roslindale, Massachusetts
Device: Kobo Libra 2, Kobo Aura H2O, PRS-650, PRS-T1, nook STR, PW3
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ralph Sir Edward View Post
Jon, I am stating there is a law on the books. That's different from there being no law on the books. The fact that the law exists has a chilling effect on the public, at least to some extent. Isn't that a rational interpretation of the current situation?

Hollywood is happy with the chilling effect without adjudication, it costs them nothing further. Besides, in a court case, they might lose. Or win.

But from an individual's viewpoint, it increases the legal risk from zero to above zero, no matter how low you may want to put it. (I concur it's very low today, but who knows what sort of hissy fit Hollywood might have tomorrow?)
But, the legalities of that law are unknown. So don't say it's 100% correct. It either is or is not. Fair Use could still trump the DMCA. Unless there is a court case, nothing is clear.
JSWolf is offline   Reply With Quote