View Single Post
Old 07-26-2014, 05:01 PM   #21
DuckieTigger
Wizard
DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DuckieTigger's Avatar
 
Posts: 4,763
Karma: 246906703
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: USA
Device: Oasis 3, Oasis 2, PW3, PW1, KT
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jessica Lares View Post
My photography teacher always told us to make sure those settings were always at max. It's problematic later on.

24x36 is a smaller space than that 24MP picture apparently, at least at 300DPI it is, probably why you didn't see any artifacts.
Not to stray too far off-topic, but the file is 6000x4000 - at the size I had it printed it equaled about 167 dpi. That is more than plenty considering regular viewing distance. And even so, I still can't see the artefacts with a magnifying glass.

If I wanted to get 300dpi, I would have been limited to a maximum print size of 12x18. Thinking that you NEED a 24mp camera for that size is truly overkill. Otherwise the megapixel war would still be ongoing ...
DuckieTigger is offline   Reply With Quote