|
Am I understanding this correctly? You are saying that the existing 320x320 extracted/reduced thumbnail would be re-inflated to 400x400, i.e. a 25% increase in both dimensions - therefore on a TabPRO a 29x45mm cover should display roughly as 36x56mm? The unknown quantity being how pixellated the average cover would appear. I'm guessing some will look better than others.
In an earlier version of CC, covers with large areas of solid red were a bit problematic (happily fixed). I've just looked at a couple of them on the TabPRO and they look OK at the existing Large size. Would these be the ones most likely to deteriorate if 'blown up' to 400x400?
If adding the pseudo-x-large is 'easy', maybe suck it and see? People will use it or not if the pixellation is excessive. The risk is that people may like the physical size but ask for a better resolution extract from the source, which is probably not what you want.
Hmmm?
|