[PKFFW]

@HarryT

I really don't see your point on this one.

The blogger has paid for the content, from multiple sources no less, so the copyright holder is going to get multiples of money from this blogger. So from that point of view there is no "theft" and there is no loss.

The blogger, admittedly, did not read the terms and condition of the contracts she signed and did not realise that she wasn't purchasing the right to watch the content in the country she is currently residing. So from that point of view she may be violating some law but it would be impossible to argue that any broadcast provider is being cheated out of their money since she has actually paid for it. So again, no loss and no "theft".

Your position seems to have nothing whatever to do with any perceived moral wrong doing on the bloggers part. It seems as if you saying the blogger should suck it up and go without because she happens to not have read the 18+ pages of each contract and so she deserves to do with out the content. That seems rather petty to me.