View Single Post
Old 07-17-2014, 08:42 PM   #20
pwalker8
Grand Sorcerer
pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,196
Karma: 70314280
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Device: iPad Pro, iPad mini, Kobo Aura, Amazon paperwhite, Sony PRS-T2
I think you read too much into that. The bar for granting stays is 1) will there be irrevocable damage and 2) are they likely to win. I believe that Apple never got past the irrevocable damages part. No comments where made on the validity of the case.

Once again, there is no guarantee that the three judge panel that heard Apple's appeal for a stay is hearing the appeal. According to what I read, basically the apples panel denied the appeal because the DOJ granted that Apple was correct in the limits that were placed on the monitor. The appeals panel confirmed the limits on the monitor, which was really what Apple was looking for.
pwalker8 is offline   Reply With Quote