View Single Post
Old 07-16-2014, 09:01 AM   #7
ApK
Award-Winning Participant
ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,393
Karma: 68715774
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NJ, USA
Device: Kindle
Quote:
Originally Posted by IcecreamLtDan View Post
That's actually more common than you think. I used to work for Bell & Howell years ago and our tech support used to constantly be bombarded from customers looking for help with disposable cameras and heat lamps. Turns out that when we got bought out, the original owners sold the rights to the name and several products were branded with Bell & Howell, even though we had nothing to do with that equipment.
[rant]
That's the result of irresponsible management, and a perfect example of how foolish people destroy a valuable brand. The Peter Principle in action, perhaps.

If a company by licensing allows its brand to be used on something, by that action alone, it most certainly "has something to do with it" and the company needs to act like it's aware of that fact, regardless of whether they are involved with the thing in any OTHER way.
[/rant]

Last edited by ApK; 07-16-2014 at 09:10 AM.
ApK is offline   Reply With Quote