View Single Post
Old 07-10-2014, 10:31 PM   #4
rkomar
Wizard
rkomar ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rkomar ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rkomar ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rkomar ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rkomar ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rkomar ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rkomar ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rkomar ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rkomar ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rkomar ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rkomar ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 3,055
Karma: 18821071
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Sudbury, ON, Canada
Device: PRS-505, PB 902, PRS-T1, PB 623, PB 840, PB 633
Miniscule pixels would make nicer looking fonts, but I don't think it would fit in very well with the current way we render images to be displayed. Current E-Ink pixels are roughly 100 microns in size (for a 250 dpi display). 1 micron pixels would increase the size of the display buffer by 10000 times. So, from about 1 MB to 10 GB needed to be computed and transferred on each screen refresh. That would make updating the screen intolerably slow using today's technology (especially in low-powered ereaders). We'd need something different for such displays, perhaps some kind of vector rather than pixel renderer.
rkomar is online now   Reply With Quote