|
So the publishers feel that they negotiated a 2 year cooling off period when they settled (avoiding trial) and Judge Cote staggered the cooling off periods in her final decision for Apple (expressly so they couldn't collude again). Now the publishers feel they got a raw deal with their settlement because they can't collude and have to wait up to 4 years instead of 2.
Seems simple. Why don't they make the publisher's settlements null and void and proceed to take the publishers to court. Apple was already found guilty of colluding with the publishers so it shouldn't be difficult to prove the publishers were also colluding.
|