View Single Post
Old 07-05-2014, 11:25 AM   #8744
Blossom
Treasure Seeker
Blossom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Blossom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Blossom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Blossom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Blossom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Blossom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Blossom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Blossom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Blossom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Blossom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Blossom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Blossom's Avatar
 
Posts: 18,708
Karma: 26026435
Join Date: Mar 2010
Device: Kobo HD Glo, Kindles, Kindle Fires, Andriod Devices
Quote:
Originally Posted by BearMountainBooks View Post
That term is used that way and also just as a general term to refer to romance (even when not mocking). It probably isn't used on romance threads, but it's used in a general sense by other readers on other forums (I know because I see it--it's also used quite often when a cover depicts some of the typical poses). It's used frequently on mystery forums that way.
It's sad it's used 95% wrong most of the time. Bodice rippers went out of publishing a long time ago. Most people just don't know any better and it's wrong to the authors who write historical romance to call their books that when you see what a bodice ripper was and what it contained. These are bodice rippers and they are not for the faint in heart to read.

Last edited by Blossom; 07-05-2014 at 11:45 AM.
Blossom is offline   Reply With Quote