View Single Post
Old 07-01-2014, 03:44 AM   #8
JSWolf
Resident Curmudgeon
JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
JSWolf's Avatar
 
Posts: 79,887
Karma: 146918083
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Roslindale, Massachusetts
Device: Kobo Libra 2, Kobo Aura H2O, PRS-650, PRS-T1, nook STR, PW3
Quote:
Originally Posted by rem736 View Post
i think (not sure of this, though) that epub3 was designed with the capability of being backwards compatible with epub2, should the producer of the ebook adhere to the recommended practices. adhering, however, is totally another issue.

progression to epub3 is inevitable. it is based on html 5 with more advanced css support and other elements such as audio and video,though both audio and video is iffy given that most up to date e-ink readers are doing away with audio ports and we know that e-ink can't really handle video. it should work fine on non-e-ink tablets, however.
I have seen some recent ePub that are trying to be ePub3 with backwards comparability with ePub2. But the really stupid thing is these ePub have no reason at all to be ePub3 as they don't offer anything that ePub2 doesn't. So why do it? Why bother to create ePub3 that's better off as ePub2?

I only found this out when I was editing one of them and managed to change something I thought was incorrect but turned out to be correct for ePub3.
JSWolf is offline   Reply With Quote