Quote:
Originally Posted by Sil_liS
Google and you shall find: https://fortunebrainstormtech.wordpr...e-cote/page/2/
Your conclusion is completely invalid.
(^emphasis mine)
For one thing it is clearly stated that the judge discussed the court's procedures for non-jury proceedings, and Apple didn't object to them. For another, as I pointed out in post #117, the judge's study of the witness affidavits benefited Apple on one occasion. |
Sigh. In your haste to play I gotcha, you didn't read closely enough. I said that I could not find the original article. You post a link to a copy that someone made of the article on wordpress. People don't make copies of every article in existance. You actually prove my point, which is that the original article is no longer out there, just copies of it scattered around.
As I have mentioned before, Apple disagrees with Judge Cote's assertion that she told Apple that she was going to write the decision before the trial and they did not object.