There is a difference between ignore and not comment. I seriously doubt anyone wants me to comment on each and every post. I comment if I think I have something to add to the discussion and I find the discussion of interest.
Contrary to popular opinion, links don't have infinite life spans, many sites use dynamically generated pages rather than static pages. For example, the following page give a nice overview of the reaction following the trial
http://www.mhpbooks.com/breaking-new...e-fixing-case/
This article has a number of links in it, yet when I follow the links, many are no longer valid, though they were when I first read the article almost a year ago. For example, I can no longer pull up the original Elmer-Dewitt articles, the page comes up, but there is no article. I don't know if there is an issue on my end, or if the articles have aged off the fortune server.
For the most part, the evidence is the footnote already referenced by Barcey where Judge Cote said "...the Court had already prepared a draft opinion...". The various links that I looked at discussed if this confirms what Elmer-Dewitt said, is it unusual to pre-write a draft opinion, what she meant by draft opinion and why she included that line in final opinion. At the time, this last point was considered significant by many.