Quote:
Originally Posted by pwalker8
I'm not dismissing anyone's opinion. I have told anyone to go away or to shut up. Obviously, I pay attention to some more than others and I'm a lot more interested in someone who gives a somewhat more detailed analysis than "Apple stinks, Judge Cote rocks", or someone who simply reiterates talking points. Thus, I'm more likely to respond to someone who talks about the legal theory behind the case, or point out a new information.
|
I never said you told anyone to shut up. You simply ignore them.
Is Graham's analysis detailed enough to be worthy of your attention?
Quote:
Originally Posted by pwalker8
I'm not sure what the question is. Do I remember more sources than just the Fortune article and the judicial rating site? Sure, quite a few. Some are sites that I don't consider particularly credible, some were sites that are behind paywalls, some who are probably repeating other reports. Keep in mind that both Fortune and the WSJ have written quite a few articles on the matter. It's also been discussed quite a bit on various legal sites.
|
This:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Graham
pwalker8, if these are not the three pieces of evidence that convinced you that Judge Cote was biased because she had prepared most of her judgement in advance, please direct us to your other sources.
|
Don't just say "it's been discussed". Apparently you have magical google skills or something, because people have looked for your sources and found them ... here on MR in your posts, and nowhere else. IF these sources exist, please provide them.