Quote:
Originally Posted by pwalker8
Of course. No one on the outside looking in can say what the true facts are, one can only go by what one has read or heard. Based on what I have read and heard, I said earlier what I thought the likely outcomes of the appeal will be. Other people may have different interpretations based on what they read and have heard. Unlike some here, I've never claimed that anyone who has a different opinion than mine must be some sort of fanboi.
|
On the other hand, the main purpose of calling people fanbois is to dismiss their opinions as biased and pointless.
You have dismissed everyone elses' opinions as biased and pointless,
without the need for calling us fanbois. Good job on that, by the way. More more effective, as ad hominem attacks go.
So you have done the direct equivalent of calling us fanbois. But we are the ones who use ad hominem attacks. You would never do such a thing. (Not even by accusing us of "claim[ing] that anyone who has a different opinion than mine must be some sort of fanboi.")