View Single Post
Old 11-09-2008, 12:25 PM   #41
Nate the great
Sir Penguin of Edinburgh
Nate the great ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Nate the great ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Nate the great ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Nate the great ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Nate the great ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Nate the great ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Nate the great ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Nate the great ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Nate the great ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Nate the great ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Nate the great ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Nate the great's Avatar
 
Posts: 12,375
Karma: 23555235
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: DC Metro area
Device: Shake a stick plus 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
Here, for example:

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/globalwarming.html

I'm not a climatologist, but the scientists who work at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) whose page I link to above, certainly are.
I misspoke before. I should not have disputed the data. What I should have said was that I dispute the conclusions drawn from the data. But I am also going to point out that the data does not support the conclusions.

It is generally argued that increases in CO2 cause increases in temperature. If this is true, then why is 1934 one of the 2 hottest years on record in the US (along with 1998)? If you look, you will see that the 3rd hottest year is 2006, and the hottest years after that are 1921 and 1931. The USA is almost certainly releasing more carbon this year than in the ones I listed. Why is the temperature lower?

http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs/Fig.D.txt
Nate the great is offline   Reply With Quote