View Single Post
Old 06-25-2014, 10:29 AM   #7
Top100EbooksRank
Banned
Top100EbooksRank ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Top100EbooksRank ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Top100EbooksRank ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Top100EbooksRank ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Top100EbooksRank ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Top100EbooksRank ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Top100EbooksRank ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Top100EbooksRank ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Top100EbooksRank ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Top100EbooksRank ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Top100EbooksRank ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 304
Karma: 6102528
Join Date: Mar 2012
Device: Kindle
PDF File
http://www.barnesandnobleinc.com/doc...FYE_ebitda.pdf

year ending May 3 2014

Nook Revenue: $506 million
Gross Profit: $82 million
Selling and Administrative Expenses: $300 million

EBITDA: ($218 million)

In order to have a positive EBITDA, Nook need to have a bigger gross profit and a much smaller selling and administrative expenses. Can that be achieve?

Overall, I think the Nook has been a disaster for B&N. It could cost the company up to $2 billion in losses when it all said and done.

I think Nook boards of directors would say with hindsight that they made a mistake by creating the Nook. B&N would be much stronger today without the Nook.
Top100EbooksRank is offline   Reply With Quote