View Single Post
Old 06-24-2014, 11:26 AM   #22
eschwartz
Ex-Helpdesk Junkie
eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
eschwartz's Avatar
 
Posts: 19,421
Karma: 85400180
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: The Beaten Path, USA, Roundworld, This Side of Infinity
Device: Kindle Touch fw5.3.7 (Wifi only)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sil_liS View Post
While ereaders made them famous, they are not enough to sustain the company.
Like the advertizing displays that HarryT mentioned? The ones that, like my ereader example are low-power dispays that last for weeks on one charge?

The point is that e-ink is about low-power dispays. Light-emitting displays serve an entirely different need, whatever form either may take. If AMOLED can be made to last on as low a charge as e-ink, it will edge out e-ink. Why is the article saying it is a threat to e-ink? They don't seem to have a reason other than "because".
eschwartz is offline   Reply With Quote