Quote:
Originally Posted by Barcey
Wow, so she made up her mind before the trial, wrote up her decision, ignored everything that didn't match what she already decided and disregarded testimony just because it didn't match what she decided. She then went and researched what all her critics were saying and cleverly wrote rebuttals in her final decision.
I don't know but that sounds like a lot of work to me. I would have thought it'd been easier to just go through the standard trial proceeding and make the final decision after. She's some devious lady. Did she wear a pointy black hat and cackle too?
|
No, no, you see: although the judge was asked for a preliminary decision, she was not supposed to make a decision (unless the decision was that Apple was innocent) because Apple waived their right to a jury trial. I mean if the defense was really sure that they could convince the judge, they must have been right.