Quote:
Originally Posted by =X=
You've definitely missed the point of my previous post as you are taking about how to compensate for the underexpose. I was merely trying to pointing out who inferior CCD vs the naked eye, (via a simple test)
Also you counter argument only further proves my point as you admit the problem is shifted to the background. Where again the naked eye sees the scene without any image loss.
=X=
|
Your example of the imaging problem which can arise with a subject indoors, beside a window on a sunny day cannot be applied to the case we are considering: two Sony readers which are both illuminated by the same ample and uniform ambient lighting. The range of lighting difference we are dealing with coming from the two readers is not as large as in the example of the window and subject that you put forward.
There is also a poster who has said that what he saw with his eyes regarding the differences looked exactly like what he sees in the photos that have been posted.