View Single Post
Old 06-22-2014, 10:19 AM   #115
Sil_liS
Wizard
Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 4,896
Karma: 33602910
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: PocketBook 903 & 360+
Quote:
Originally Posted by pwalker8 View Post
No, I've included links in the past. It was a major point of discussion for a few weeks right after Judge Cote announced her initial decision. I'm sure if you put some work into it, you can find references to it, if not here, then on the internet. Some people said that it was an unusual thing to do that opened her up to the charge of bias, others waved it off as normal procedure. My understanding is that while it might be normal to keep notes and a rough outline, something to the extent that she seems to do is unusual. It certainly _gives_ the appearance of bias, which is something judges are suppose to avoid.
You haven't included links in the past to a source for your claim about the judge's admission. I've looked. It's not difficult since the forum has very nice search options. I've read your posts and I followed the links and there is nothing about this admission.

Also logically if this claim were true, it would have been mentioned in Apple's appeal.
Sil_liS is offline   Reply With Quote