View Single Post
Old 06-20-2014, 03:47 PM   #94
Sil_liS
Wizard
Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 4,896
Karma: 33602910
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: PocketBook 903 & 360+
Quote:
Originally Posted by pwalker8 View Post
Apple might have asked the judge to rule that the prosecutors did not have a case (i.e. summary judgement) , but that is very different that asking for a judgement before the trial. They are very different things. There are a lot of things that happen as a matter of course in a trial. There are many pro forma motions that sound impressive if you don't know the normal procedures, but in real life rarely mean anything.

The basic issue that people point to is the fact that Judge Cote wrote the majority of her final decision _before_ the trial actually started. That doesn't have anything to do with motions filed before the trial, nor does it have anything to do with Judge Cote denying the motion for summary judgement.
What makes you say that this is a fact?
Sil_liS is offline   Reply With Quote