Quote:
Originally Posted by Sil_liS
On a previous thread pwalker8's position on this subject was that Apple was being treated unfairly because the judge wasn't following the rules and was overreaching. Now his position seems to be that since the system has rules that are skewed in favor of the defense (like the fact that prosecutors have to give any evidence for the defendant's innocence while the defense doesn't have to hand over evidence of wrongdoing, and the fact that the defense can hold off on presenting their arguments so that the opposition doesn't have time to think about a good reply) it just shouldn't be possible for a judge to find Apple guilty.
|
I vaguely remember pwalker8 making statements about Judge Cote over-reaching. I didn't read the post that I responded to as suggesting that "
it just shouldn't be possible for a judge to find Apple guilty." I simply saw it as addressing the way the US justice system works, with no particular slant on whether it worked in Apple's favour or not.
Personally, I'm only vaguely interested in the case. I subscribed to the thread so that I'd be able to see when decisions where made.