Quote:
Originally Posted by avantman42
I don't think anyone has claimed that it does. As far as I can tell, pwalker8 was simply making a statement about how the system works, not commenting on how good or bad it is.
|
On a previous thread pwalker8's position on this subject was that Apple was being treated unfairly because the judge wasn't following the rules and was overreaching. Now his position seems to be that since the system has rules that are skewed in favor of the defense (like the fact that prosecutors have to give any evidence for the defendant's innocence while the defense doesn't have to hand over evidence of wrongdoing, and the fact that the defense can hold off on presenting their arguments so that the opposition doesn't have time to think about a good reply) it just shouldn't be possible for a judge to find Apple guilty.