View Single Post
Old 11-08-2008, 11:15 AM   #71
=X=
Wizard
=X= ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.=X= ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.=X= ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.=X= ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.=X= ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.=X= ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.=X= ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.=X= ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.=X= ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.=X= ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.=X= ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
=X='s Avatar
 
Posts: 3,671
Karma: 12205348
Join Date: Mar 2008
Device: Galaxy S, Nook w/CM7
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seabound View Post
That does not make much sense to me. The amount of light that reaches the human eye will be the same amount that reaches the camera sensors, although eye and camera will have different sensitivities and resolutions.
That is exactly the point I make. The eye has the ability to capture all of that information and register it and compensate without any human awareness. Digital cameras (CCD) have very narrow resolution and low light depth, compared to the human eye.

For instance take a picture of a person standing in front of a window, (on a sunny a day). Prior to taking picture note the individual. Then take a picture. You will see the resulting image have the person look as if they are hidden in a shadow.

Again the same amount of light that enters the human eye enters the camera, but the final image of the camera is far worse than what was seen with the naked eye.
=X=

Last edited by =X=; 11-08-2008 at 11:20 AM. Reason: updated grammer
=X= is offline   Reply With Quote