View Single Post
Old 06-19-2014, 12:50 PM   #14
fjtorres
Grand Sorcerer
fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.fjtorres ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 11,732
Karma: 128354696
Join Date: May 2009
Location: 26 kly from Sgr A*
Device: T100TA,PW2,PRS-T1,KT,FireHD 8.9,K2, PB360,BeBook One,Axim51v,TC1000
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dngrsone View Post
Just because a character/concept is still capable of making money, it doesn't mean someone can sit on the copyright/trademark forever.
That is exactly what it means.
As long as you are actually *trying* to make money off a trademark the law says nobody can muscle in, no matter how brilliant or creative they might be. You don't even have to be making money off the property, just be able to police its use.

If Doyle had trademarked SHERLOCK HOLMES, the estate would've won, hands down. Absent an active trademark, they're out of luck.

The owners of the James Bond trademarks have had issues defending aspects of their products precisely for not registering their trademark in a timely fashion.

http://www.mondaq.com/x/84656/Tradem...es+Bond+Brands

Last edited by fjtorres; 06-19-2014 at 12:56 PM.
fjtorres is offline   Reply With Quote