Quote:
Originally Posted by =X=
The degradation in the photograph is caused by the plastic covering the 700. Since the human eye is far superior than most digital cameras the reduction in light absorbed by the plastic cover is captured in the digital camera but not to the naked eye.
=X=
|
That does not make much sense to me. The amount of light that reaches the human eye will be the same amount that reaches the camera sensors, although eye and camera will have different sensitivities and resolutions. The only way that the image of the PRS-700 would be artificially degraded relative to the PRS-505 in this case is if the light from the PRS-700 is at the sensitivity threshold of the camera, which does not appear to be the case in the photos.