Quote:
Originally Posted by pwalker8
Because they actually had experience dealing with Judge Cote? Because Judge Cote wrote a majority of her opinion the the Apple case before the trial actually started? Because Judge Cote's comments in the case indicated that she was dismissing or ignoring evidence that didn't agree with what she went into the case believing? Because, there are a lot of judges like that in the legal system? There are a lot of reasons that I find the lawyers comments believable. As I said, we will see how the appeals turn out.
|
The comments that she made were after she had seen all the evidence because all the evidence must be given before the pretrial. Because this is the point of the pretrial: to determine which evidence is admitted at trial.