Quote:
Originally Posted by pwalker8
Because they actually had experience dealing with Judge Cote? Because Judge Cote wrote a majority of her opinion the the Apple case before the trial actually started? Because Judge Cote's comments in the case indicated that she was dismissing or ignoring evidence that didn't agree with what she went into the case believing? Because, there are a lot of judges like that in the legal system? There are a lot of reasons that I find the lawyers comments believable. As I said, we will see how the appeals turn out.
|
And perhaps because they confirm your bias? Don't pretend that doesn't play a part. After all, I'm sure there's lawyers (who have experience dealing with judge Cote) who DON'T think those any of those things. Do you ignore their expert opinions simply because they aren't speaking out publically about her?