Quote:
Originally Posted by Barcey
Yes but but anonymous internet posters have said that Judge Cote actually reads the pretrial evidence and opinions before she goes to court and draws conclusions on the presented facts prior to going to the trial phase. She then apparently has the audacity to disregard trial testimony (and clever lawyer spin) that doesn't align with the pretrial evidence. According to internet lore this suspicious preparation is known as 'bias'.
|
I think the issue is that some lawyers who have appeared before Judge Cote say that she tends to making up her mind before all the arguments and evidence is presented and ignoring or waving aside anything that doesn't agree with that conclusion.