Quote:
Originally Posted by ApK
Hmm...this is tough one.
Here's a quote on the case from judge Cote, the judge who reviewed all the court evidence:
"In this straightforward price-fixing case, no further showing is required."
But anonymous Internet forum poster pwalker8 says this is not a price fixing case.
Who's opinion to trust? Hmm, tough one... |
I really don't understand how anyone can come down on the side of collusion. The fact that the publishers "never admitted guilt" but agreed to "not to do it again" -- is beside the point. Jobs was publicly bragging about the fact that prices would be coming up -- before it happened. No amount of denial can ignore that fact.