View Single Post
Old 06-15-2014, 08:26 PM   #34
JSWolf
Resident Curmudgeon
JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
JSWolf's Avatar
 
Posts: 80,212
Karma: 148951761
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Roslindale, Massachusetts
Device: Kobo Libra 2, Kobo Aura H2O, PRS-650, PRS-T1, nook STR, PW3
Quote:
Originally Posted by pwalker8 View Post
The legal question that comes into play is was the actions that the publishers were accused of (getting together to insist on an agency pricing model) inherently illegal. If it isn't, then you have to prove that the consumers were harmed. Many claim that it is, yet the specific case appears no where in a law and the courts haven't ruled on that specific issue.
The retailers don't have to prove that the customers were hurt. They have to prove that THEY were hurt. Agency did hurt some retailers for sure. Fictionwise (for example) had a way of doing business that worked before agency pricing. After agency pricing, Fictionwise's business model no longer worked and people did not shop there like they used to because people went there because of their business model.

Last edited by JSWolf; 06-15-2014 at 08:28 PM.
JSWolf is offline   Reply With Quote