View Single Post
Old 06-15-2014, 06:48 AM   #6
cryzed
Evangelist
cryzed ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cryzed ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cryzed ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cryzed ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cryzed ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cryzed ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cryzed ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cryzed ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cryzed ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cryzed ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.cryzed ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
cryzed's Avatar
 
Posts: 408
Karma: 1050547
Join Date: Mar 2011
Device: Kindle Oasis 2
I suppose. It would mostly be a problem because it adds tons of overhead to existing adapters and the stand-alone versions of the script (command-line and Google App Engine), simply don't have anything to do with Calibre. Using Calibre specific code in every adapter file (100+ since recently) doesn't feel very good.

EDIT: Nevermind, I misunderstood you. You meant putting that try-except block into the packages submodule and then re-importing the names from within. That's a good idea.
cryzed is offline   Reply With Quote