Quote:
Originally Posted by desertgrandma
My response was to Mr. Jordens "mooching bully' comment. I never intended it to say that we were the only countries contributing, etc.
As for "migrants' America has always welcomed immigrants...........legally.
The problem is the crushing financial burden illegals bring.
Any child who walks into school must be enrolled, no questions asked. If they do not speak Engilsh, the school is responsible for teaching them. If they have special needs, the school is responsible for providing the proper tools, teachers, aides, needed.
Any person walking into emergency rooms must be treated regardless of ability to pay, and proof of citizenship must not even be asked. Talk to your local hospital administration and ask how that works out.
Illegals are hired using stolen id's......thats a nightmare you'd better hope you never run into.
|
I understand, and can relate to that, since in Belgium we experience the same issues with many North african, and poorer south european nations seeking refuge in a wealthier country.
I neither do I want to sound offensive to you, but all I'm saying is, that it matters not where you go in the (Western) world; the same problems seem to appear in the same type of (wealthy to semi-wealthy) nations,I believe due to there being too many people on the planet (about 4 or 6 billion today?).
A lot of people,born out of wedlock are one of the main reasons why; which is connected to the sexual revolution of the seventies.
A lot of freedoms we gain, (partly due to a more liberal party in power, like eg: a president) in the end always comes back to us.
I know I'm really running on an edge here,of a political flamewar on the forum for some,so I don't really want to go too deep about my opinions which probably not many care for anyways

..
But the immigrant issue, I fear maybe only a dictator as president will be able to change that.
Yet I know a dictator is really not what you want as president, if you read back in history of nations ruled by one..
Anyways,I heard on the radio today, that the president elected yesterday, actually will be elected by... something else political in December, am I right?
I mean, certain lawsuits where to be done or something...
Or have I heard that incorrect?