View Single Post
Old 05-28-2014, 04:26 AM   #126
HarryT
eBook Enthusiast
HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
HarryT's Avatar
 
Posts: 85,557
Karma: 93980341
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by rhadin View Post
Your definition of monopoly (100% of market) is NOT the legal definition of monopoly. Whether an entity qualifies as a monopoly is determined by market share plus influence in market. An entity can be a monopolist with only a 40% market share.
It should be noted, however, that being a monopoly is not illegal. What is illegal is abusing a monopoly position to disadvantage either customers or suppliers. It's absolutely fine to be a monopoly and conduct business fairly.
HarryT is offline   Reply With Quote