View Single Post
Old 05-27-2014, 02:57 PM   #42
tubemonkey
monkey on the fringe
tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
tubemonkey's Avatar
 
Posts: 45,746
Karma: 158575914
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Seattle Metro
Device: Moto E6, Echo Show
Quote:
Originally Posted by BearMountainBooks View Post
I can't remember if they did or not--once again though the software was their main issue. The difference is they are only buying books that they can use indefinitely. Mine were on the list to be bought, but they ran out of money before doing so. I don't know if it will work out for them long term or not. Readers want a catalog that changes -- and they do want best sellers and authors they have heard of. None of the big publishers are going to do a "buy once, read forever" deal with libraries. And maintaining private software can become very expensive as well.
It wouldn't be an all or nothing proposition. The idea is to get libraries to expand their collections without having to go through middlemen like Adobe and OverDrive. This collection of books would supplement their existing catalogs of best sellers and authors [readers] have heard of, thereby giving taxpayers greater variety and more bang for their buck.
tubemonkey is offline   Reply With Quote