View Single Post
Old 05-25-2014, 01:09 PM   #58
eschwartz
Ex-Helpdesk Junkie
eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
eschwartz's Avatar
 
Posts: 19,421
Karma: 85400180
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: The Beaten Path, USA, Roundworld, This Side of Infinity
Device: Kindle Touch fw5.3.7 (Wifi only)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CommonReader View Post
That's a bit of pseud insight. Yes, all major corporations want to expand their business, but the business culture of companies can be markedly different.

I'm not so sure that Hachette's decision is so bad, either. Public complaints by major companies about Amazon abusing its market position will at some point motivate regulators to take a much closer look at Amazon. In my perception it's also more damaging for Amazon's brand, as it shows that they put their squabbles with suppliers ahead of serving their customers.
You are still missing the point. Amazon is not doing anything wrong. Their only crime is apparently being more interested in themselves than their customers and suppliers... which shouldn't come as a shock to anyone... because SURPRISE Hachette does the exact same thing!

No business culture is different, because that would require them to be a charity.

Again, Amazon has done everything by the books, aboveboard and legal. In doing so, they have simply proven to be better at business than the publishers. In what way is that wrong or evil or in any way even remotely objectionable?
eschwartz is offline   Reply With Quote