View Single Post
Old 04-18-2014, 04:20 AM   #4
chaley
Grand Sorcerer
chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 12,499
Karma: 8065348
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Notts, England
Device: Kobo Libra 2
The problem isn't the validation formatter. It already indicates that any desired field exists.

The template editor uses the normal formatter so that it can show sample values for the template when editing composite column templates. Perhaps when it is in a no-book context it should use the validation formatter and not attempt show any sample values. That would be relatively easy to do.
chaley is offline   Reply With Quote