Thread: Amazon rumored to introduce a smart phone in July
View Single Post
Old 04-14-2014, 07:45 PM   #30
frahse
occasional author
frahse ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.frahse ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.frahse ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.frahse ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.frahse ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.frahse ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.frahse ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.frahse ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.frahse ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.frahse ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.frahse ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
frahse's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,315
Karma: 2064403292
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Wandering God's glorious hills, valleys and plains.
Device: A Franklin BI (before Internet) was the first. I still have it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sregener View Post
Well, technically, Republic doesn't have the Moto G either. They've announced that they're going to have it, but they don't have it yet.

Ting is really interested in offering the Moto G. But they have to test it, and get approval from Sprint to offer it. I wouldn't be surprised to see them offer it in the next month or two, as they've been pretty quick to offer the latest and greatest devices, and the Moto G looks like a perfect fit for their model.

Of course, if you buy the Moto G and go with Republic now, nothing prevents you from switching to Ting as soon as they support it. Republic and Ting both use the same network - Sprint's - so the phones should work fine with either service.

But we're getting pretty far afield from the official topic, which is whether Amazon is going to release a competitive phone in July, and whether it will work on pay-as-you-go services like Ting and Republic...
One problem perhaps.
The Republic Wireless phones are a special breed. Not an ordinary Moto X or Moto G.
frahse is offline   Reply With Quote