View Single Post
Old 05-08-2006, 07:21 AM   #4
Snappy!
Addict
Snappy! has a spectacular aura aboutSnappy! has a spectacular aura aboutSnappy! has a spectacular aura aboutSnappy! has a spectacular aura aboutSnappy! has a spectacular aura aboutSnappy! has a spectacular aura aboutSnappy! has a spectacular aura aboutSnappy! has a spectacular aura aboutSnappy! has a spectacular aura aboutSnappy! has a spectacular aura aboutSnappy! has a spectacular aura about
 
Snappy!'s Avatar
 
Posts: 260
Karma: 4256
Join Date: Feb 2006
Device: SHARP Zaurus C1000
Usually, I quite like MS ... but some of these patents is really ridiculous. On the other hand, the culprit is really USPTO. Why does it issue such patents at all?? I thought the Patent office will engage some agents or staffs to make sure there is no prior art and stuffs like that?

For MS, the only saving grace I can think of is that in today's market, companies just file patents for anything they design to safe themselves from future lawsuits. In that sense, MS is just doing what is in its best interest.

So, the million dollar question is really still ... why oh why did USPTO issue such a patent??
Snappy! is offline   Reply With Quote