View Single Post
Old 04-08-2014, 02:56 PM   #13
CWatkinsNash
IOC Chief Archivist
CWatkinsNash ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CWatkinsNash ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CWatkinsNash ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CWatkinsNash ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CWatkinsNash ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CWatkinsNash ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CWatkinsNash ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CWatkinsNash ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CWatkinsNash ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CWatkinsNash ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CWatkinsNash ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
CWatkinsNash's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,950
Karma: 53868218
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Fruitland Park, FL, USA
Device: Meebook M7, Paperwhite 2021, Fire HD 8+, Fire HD 10+, Lenovo Tab P12
Quote:
Originally Posted by DiapDealer View Post
What I notice more and more, is that many people seem to be taking a huge amount of pride in how busy they are, and how hectic their day has been. I understand having "hectic" inflicted on us at various times, but I don't understand "frantically busy" being a goal that one takes pride in. I'm not built that way. Hectic is a temporary (and unwanted) condition to be survived and quickly remedied... not sought out.
We are alike, it seems. If my life ever gets to the point where I only have time to read something the size of an internet article, it's a problem in need of fixing, not something to adapt to.

To go back to the OP:

Quote:
Can you still consume dense prose and convoluted sentences with relish? (assuming you ever did!)
I don't think I ever did, really. Sure, I can read dense and convoluted but I'm a visual reader so if the style interferes with the visuals in my head, it's just not as enjoyable for me. I've always been that way. Now, some "dense" prose fits my style just fine, so I guess it's more accurately a matter of author voice rather than the number or size of the words and the complexity of sentence construction.

I object to the term "serious reading" (from the article title). What does that even mean?
CWatkinsNash is offline   Reply With Quote