View Single Post
Old 03-31-2014, 12:52 PM   #20
QuantumIguana
Philosopher
QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
QuantumIguana's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,034
Karma: 18736532
Join Date: Jan 2012
Device: Kindle Paperwhite 2 gen, Kindle Fire 1st Gen, Kindle Touch
An e-ink screen which had the capacity to refresh faster wouldn't use more energy unless it actually was refreshing faster. With reading, you only need to refresh when you turn a page. LCD has to refresh everything constantly. A faster e-ink would only have to refresh what actually changed. Imagine you're watching where the background is static. The background wouldn't need to be refreshed. Or you're playing a game where most of the screen remains the same for long periods of time.

The color in color e-ink isn't currently as good as the color in LCD, and it isn't currently able to refresh as quickly, but the demise of e-ink is rather exaggerated. E-ink is a new technology, and just a few years ago was the stuff of science fiction.
QuantumIguana is offline   Reply With Quote